Taking another person’s life is really a heinous crime that devastates people, communities, and society as a whole. The severe punishment serves for a deterrent to prospective offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
Though the punishment may be severe, its purpose is not solely to seek vengeance but to prevent likely offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to make it ideal on the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision from the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Note: Please fill any discipline and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave area blank.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it's unclear how it applies to any provided situation, usually rendering judgments based about the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances in the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for foreseeable future similar cases.
four. It goes without indicating that observations made hereinabove are merely tentative in nature and strictly confined for the disposal of immediate bail petition.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice to the loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment around the offender, guaranteeing they are held accountable for their actions.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that on the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out from the counsel for that respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may exist conflicts between the assorted decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences might not be resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, along with case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, may be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It consists of the execution of the convicted person for a consequence of their crime.
This article delves into the intricacies with the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to deliver a comprehensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to your healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. common law cases In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it can be important that the case established the application in the precautionary principle where there is actually a risk to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of your State in protecting the right to your clean and healthy environment.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded for the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )